Responsibilities Of Government Management †Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Responsibilities Of Government Management? Answer: Introduction General topic- In the modern world, protection of the environment is an important aspect of the society. It is the responsibility of the society as well as the organisations working in the society to maintain a clean and sustainable environment. Specific statement- In this scenario, it can be said that the responsibility for keeping the environment clean needs to be shared by the people of a country or the society. This can help in maintaining the sustainable development of an environment with an integrated approach. Issue statement- However, most people in a society believe that the Government need to take up the initiative in order to maintain the environment. The entire responsibility needs to be shouldered by the Government of each state. Thesis statement- In the light of this, it can be said that the responsibility for cleaning up the environment lies with the society dwellers as well. The Government does not need to take primary responsibility for addressing the issues related to the environment. Controlling ideas- The idea mainly lies with the private and public sector that sets up business management in the society. The corporate social responsibility needs to be maintained in order to gain the goodwill of the Government and the public. Responsibility of private and public sector Topic sentence- It is the primary responsibility of the private and public sectors to deal with the issues that arise in the environment. This is mainly because of the fact that these sectors utilise the resources available in the environment to manufacture its products. This may cause damage to the environment as the resources are depleted. Supporting evidence- This can be supported by the fact that the depletion of natural resources leads to change in climate (Jackson and Lynch 2011). The climate change can cause natural disasters that can affect the people. For example, if the reduction of trees in the forest can cause global warming this, in turn, affects the environment. This is evidence from the increased humidity in most part of the world (Mascia 2016). Counter argument- However, Smith (2013) countered this by saying that the entire responsibility does not lie with the sectors. This is because the Government itself provides entry to the private sectors. Moreover, the Government also runs the public sectors. Hence, it is important for the Government to take responsibility for the environment along with the organisations. Support for the counter- This is evidenced by the fact that the Government sets up rules and regulations related to the conservation of the environment. For example, the general rule that the Government of every country sets up is the less emission of harmful particles in air and water (Com?nescu 2010). This is because pollution of these natural resources can lead to harmful effects for the people in the society. Refutation- Nevertheless, it can be said that in order to maintain the environment it is necessary that the Government, as well as the sectors, maintain coordination. This is needed in order to stabilise the environment from any damage that may be caused due to the harmful emissions of pollution by the factories (Tai and Chuang 2014). Thus, this is necessary for the effective conservation of resources. Support of the refutation- This can be supported by the fact that the mutual collaboration can help in bringing about the conservative use of natural resources. The sharing of responsibility is required for balancing the work environment and the natural environment. In this way, the climatic change can also be controlled. This is evidenced by the fact that the less amount of wastage of resources can bring about the proper conservation of the natural environment. Concluding sentence- It can be concluded that the protection of the environment needs to be done by keeping in mind the ways by which different sectors contribute to the sustainability. In this regard, it can be said that the mutual responsibility can be effective for keeping maintaining of an environment. Government does not possess financial capability Topic sentence- Often it has been seen that people prefer private sectors instead of Government sectors. This is because of the fact that private sectors have more financial stability than the public sectors. Hence, the investment that a private sector can afford may not be carried out by the public sectors. Thus, people prefer private sectors to take control of protecting the environment. Supporting evidence- This can be evidenced by the fact that private sectors made effort in encouraging people to put extra effort for the loss suffered in Paris. The financial assistance that the suffered families needed was provided more by the private sectors instead of the public sectors (Bansal and Kanwar 2013). Hence, it is important that private sectors take up the role of protecting the environment and keep people safe from the harmful emissions of pollution. Counter argument- However, Kolk (2016) countered this by saying that the social responsibility needs to be taken by both the private as well as the public sectors. This is because some of the public sectors can also emit harmful particles and cause ill effects to the society. The funding may be a problem for the public sector, but the spread of awareness and creating campaigns can be done easily by this sector. Support for the counter- This is supported by the fact that the Government has initiated most campaigns that have resulted in the success in case of natural calamities (Montz, Tobin and Hagelman 2017). For example, during the Paris tragedy, the initial campaign contributors were the public sector of the country. This is evident enough keeping in mind the responses received and the way things took a turn for the good in the country (Blaikie et al. 2014). Refutation- Nevertheless, the collaboration between both these sectors is important for environment conservation. Frumkin (2016), stated that the contribution made by the people of the society is also essential for the maintaining the environment in a positive manner. Support of the refutation- This can be attributed to the fact that the people residing in the society also release wastes in the waters and on the street. Hence, the contribution of the people in keeping the environment clean is the first step for maintaining a sustainable environment. For example, if the society is clean then the people residing in the society can oppose the wastes dumped by the sectors. In this regard, financial stability does not play a role in the cleaning up of an environment. Concluding sentence- It can be said that the financial power of the private sectors gives it an edge over the public sector in terms of contributing and maintaining a sustainable environment. Conclusion Summary of main ideas- The main idea of the essay is the fact that the Government need to take up responsibility in terms of protecting the environment. However, the private sectors also play a vital role in providing financial assistance to the society. Restate the thesis- The thesis statement aimed at establishing the importance of Government responsibility in the protection of the environment. The essay also focuses on the ways by which private sectors contribute to the sustainability of the environment. Concluding comment- It can be concluded that Government, as well as the private sector, need to maintain the sustainability of the environment. Reference Bansal, N. and Kanwar, S.S., 2013. Peroxidase (s) in environment protection.The Scientific World Journal,2013. Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I. and Wisner, B., 2014.At risk: natural hazards, people's vulnerability and disasters. Routledge. https://www.microdis-eu.be/sites/default/files/D4.4.5%20-%20Combined%20Literature%20Review.pdf Com?nescu, M., 2010. Increasing Responsibility towards Environment.Theoretical Applied Economics,17(5). https://store.ectap.ro/articole/467.pdf Frumkin, H. ed., 2016.Environmental health: from global to local. John Wiley Sons. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Professor_Eric_Noji_Md/publication/296667415_DISASTER_PREPAREDNESS/links/56d7641708aee73df6c30f51/DISASTER-PREPAREDNESS.pdf Jackson, T. and Lynch, W., 2011. Public sector responses to climate change: Evaluating the role of Scottish local government in implementing the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009.Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, (8-9). https://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/cjlg/article/viewFile/2420/2651 Kolk, A., 2016. The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development.Journal of World Business,51(1),pp.23-34.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280493611_The_social_responsibility_of_international_business_From_ethics_and_the_environment_to_CSR_and_sustainable_development Mascia, M., 2016. Science, responsibility, and government.Toxicological Environmental Chemistry,98(9), pp.1115-1118. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02772248.2015.1041958?journalCode=gtec20 Montz, B.E., Tobin, G.A. and Hagelman III, R.R., 2017.Natural hazards: explanation and integration. Guilford Publications. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=enlr=id=gw_kDAAAQBAJoi=fndpg=PP1dq=Montz,+B.E.,+Tobin,+G.A.+and+Hagelman+III,+R.R.,+2017.+Natural+hazards:+explanation+and+integration.+Guilford+Publications.+ots=DJ8pcdpeTjsig=3K5BEvOYkyoHqsA1TB4EpA4FHP0#v=onepageqf=false Smith, K., 2013.Environmental hazards: assessing risk and reducing disaster. Routledge. https://books.google.co.in/books?hl=enlr=id=hOTfCgAAQBAJoi=fndpg=PP1dq=Smith,+K.,+2013.+Environmental+hazards:+assessing+risk+and+reducing+disaster.+Routledgeots=CTRJrwY68Ssig=bCMCTCVJOov9w1fFwl-GxRa9ESg#v=onepageqf=false Tai, F.M. and Chuang, S.H., 2014. Corporate social responsibility. business,6(03), p.117. https://file.scirp.org/pdf/IB_2014091916083406.pdf